*Geek Box: Soy Isoflavones & Prostate Cancer

*Geek Box: Soy Isoflavones & Prostate Cancer

Before they can be fully absorbed, soy isoflavones are metabolised by gut bacteria; this is a step that is now recognised as a critical stage in metabolism and ultimate bioactivity of all (poly)phenol compounds. While genistein exerts biological activity, the activity of daidzein may rely on conversion to equol. Equal is exclusively a product of bacterial metabolism of daidzein and does not appear in the body unless soy foods are produced in the diet.

One potential mechanism through which soy isoflavones and equol may lower PCa risk is through the oestrogen-receptor beta [ER-ß]. Of the two oestrogen-receptors, ER-alpha induces cell hyper-proliferation, a fancy term for the rapid growth and replication of cells that is an important characteristic of cancers. In contrast, ER-ß counter acts this process, and both genistein and equol display a high affinity for binding to the ER-ß, which may suppress cell growth.

Importantly for PCa, ER-ß is present in the prostate gland. Another potential role for equol is in relation to the androgen, DHT, as high circulating levels of DHT appear to stimulate the growth of cancerous cells in the prostate. Equol has been shown to bind to DHT, thus preventing it from binding to androgen-receptors in the prostate. Genistein may also inhibit the production of prostate-specific antigen [PSA], an androgen-dependent gene.

It is important to note that each of the mechanisms identified for soy isoflavones and equol in the prostate that influence the androgen-receptor pathways are independent of actual effects on male sex hormone production, e.g., testosterone. Despite the urban myths, and despite my thorough enjoyment of winding up the plant-based crowd with soy-related tropes, soy consumption has no adverse effects on testosterone levels.

It is also important to note that the potential mechanisms outlined above are derived from either animal models or in vitro studies, so we must be cautious not to over-extrapolate. However, such evidence is useful in considering the biological plausibility of associations noted in epidemiology.